FundFinder

Application form analysis

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) · GB · uk-ukri

Advanced materials: highlight notice

2 form file(s) downloaded; 5 writing prompts; 30 fields/sections; moderate — substantial written sections

0 questions 5 writing prompts moderate — substantial written sections

Original form files

Extracted form content

Writing prompts (5)
  • provide comprehensive quality reviews.
  • details of the applicant involved so you can identify any conflicts of interest
  • Provide comments and recommendations that are consistent with, justify, and
  • explain your scores.
  • Write in plain English, avoiding jargon.
Form fields (30)
  • budget
  • Updated 27 September 2024
  • National Wind Tunnel Facility
  • Resilient Economy and Security through
  • Projects Call
  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • Background to Distributed Peer Review
  • Projects
  • Rules and guidance for applicants
  • General
  • review on TFS
  • funding opportunity
  • Submission of an application
  • Eligibility checks
  • Assessment criteria
  • Review system
  • Rules and guidelines for reviewers
  • Reviewer conduct
  • Conflicts of interest
  • Reviewing and grading applications
  • Providing a high quality review
  • each other
  • Writing and submitting your review
  • come back to later
  • the text box
  • Scoring applications
  • Decision making
  • Feedback to applicants
  • Contacts