Application form analysis
Royal Society Te Apārangi · NZ · nz-te-aparangi
James Cook Research Fellowship
1 form file(s) downloaded; 5 explicit questions; 10 writing prompts; 55 fields/sections; heavy — expect a full proposal pack
5 questions
10 writing prompts
heavy — expect a full proposal pack
Extracted form content
Questions (5)
- their own point of view. Could the association be perceived as a conflict of interest?
- Does the decision (yes/no to relevance) seem appropriate?
- capability development?
- that budget for Māori involvement, capability development and consultation?
- How do I decide whether to include a Vision Mātauranga statement in my proposal?
Writing prompts (10)
- identifying and taking appropriate action over conflicts of interest
- included as a benefit category and is not included in the assessment criteria. The information will be used
- includes intellectual property, financial and all other information. For this reason, the proposal material is
- provide a framework for assessment
- explained, and timings given where appropriate. For an overview diagram of panellist workflow, see
- include the EOI process, grading and scoring, large panel process if required, and details of referee finding.
- discussed separately. The initial combined scores are used as guidance to begin the discussions, but grades
- state that funds awarded are to cover the full costs of a proposal. Full costing includes direct costs,
- completed all requirements for conferment of their PhD by the EOI closing date in February.
- indicated N/A or not.
Form fields (55)
- track record of the PI impossible to assess from the proposal.
- Principal Investigator has been deemed eligible to apply for a Fast-Start grant. Concerns about the
- budget and merit of the proposals.
- Whiriwhiri
Guidelines for Council
- and Panel Members
- FUNDING FOR RESEARCH
EXCELLENCE
- Contents
- Introduction
- Changes for 2026
- science-funding-drive-innovation
- Sensitive issues
Privacy
- Conflicts of interest
- be no conflict
- the company
- Unconscious bias
- Paearu aromatawai
Assessment criteria
- Research
- Benefit
- Zealand
- related activities
- for New Zealand
- Other aspects of the proposal
- Narrative CVs
- Marsden Fund assessment panels
- timetables for meetings
- Procedures for panel meetings
- Roles and tasks
- Meeting formats
- Normal panel process
- Large panel process
- Panellist orientation
- Proposal formatting breaches
- Significant material advantage
- material advantage
- Applicant error
- Scoring EOIs
- Grading and distribution
- proposals
- Ranking and cut-off point
- Referees
- Feedback on EOIs
- Pre-meeting
- Referee reports and applicant responses
- Grading full proposals
- Feedback on Full Proposals
- Other considerations
- Guide on project size
- Fast-Start programme
- Fast-Start eligibility
- Thank you
- Timetable
- TBA Results announced
22
- Background
- development
- Categories of Research